Skip to main content

Was Atal Bihari Vajpayee planted by Nehru to derail the nationalistic agenda of Bhartiya Jan Sangh?

Since Vajpayee has been many times brought forward in the context of Dr. Swamy, it is important to clear prevailing misconceptions about India's former PM. To get a 360-degree view, knowing the other side is also important.

While several myths surround Vajpayee, there is one myth that needs to be busted for the benefit of the common public. 

MYTH: Vajpayee was a Sanghi

As Vajpayee was associated with Bhartiya Jan Sangh in its early days, many believed him to be a hardcore Sanghi. However, let me state that nothing could be farther from the truth. 

Fact: Vajpayee was Nehru's implant

The fact is Vajpayee was a Hindi journalist who got associated with Jan Sangh. Later he built trust and developed proximity with SP Mookerjee. 

Vajpayee was also affiliated with Communist student wing during his younger days. He was alleged to be a police informer in his early days against Freedom fighters during British rule. 

On many occasions, Vajpayee double-crossed and betrayed  Freedom fighters.

Vajpayee was very young when he became MP for the first time in 1957. During his first term as MP, Nehru introduced Vajpayee as a dynamic young politician. Nehru prophesized that Vajpayee will become PM one day. From day one, Vajpayee was a darling of paid media, which is only possible if he had the blessings of Nehru. 

Vajpayee was a covert informer of Nehru and was deliberately implanted in Bhartiya Jan Sangh to derail the nationalistic agenda of SP Mookerjee. He often passed on sensitive information regarding Jan Sangh's plans to Nehru through invisible agents.

During the emergency, Vajpayee used to send messages to other leaders appealing them to apologize to Indira Gandhi. He wrote an apology letter to Indira Gandhi to come out on parole while other genuine activists suffered in jail. Such conduct is unbecoming of a leader who was perceived to be a Hindutva icon.

Vajpayee facilitated the split and fall of the Janta government by passing critical info to Indira Gandhi. In 1980, Vajpayee formed Bhartiya Janta Party (BJP) & kept all his internal adversaries out of the party. He adopted Gandhian Socialism, which has no relation with right-wing capitalism. Vajpayee's idea of Gandhian Socialism was inspired by the leftist Congress. 

Nationalists like SP Mookerjee parted ways with Nehru and formed Bhartiya Jan Sangh for the sake of the country. While Jan Sangh founders gave up their lives for nationalistic cause, Vajpayee never seriously pursued the matter of mysterious deaths of SP Mookerjee and Deen Dayal Upadhyay. In both cases, Vajpayee tried to hush up the matter which raises doubts over his sincerity towards Jan Sangh's ideology.

BJP has been in power for more than 12 years, yet none of the BJP leaders have seriously attempted to honour the sacrifice of Jan Sangh founders. 

In this context, would it be wise to consider Vajpayee as a Hindutva leader? By doing so, aren't the Hindus committing to live in darkness while craving for light? One can have brilliant oratory skills but still lack the Hindutva aptitude that defines the character of an individual. Therefore, oratory can never be a substitute for strong-willed leaders who can make the right decisions during a crisis. 

Vajpayee had a special fondness for beef and had no qualms about staying with a married woman despite proclaiming himself to be a Bachelor. Yet presenting Vajpayee as a Hindutva leader is an utter disgrace for a nation that basks in the glory of Hinduism. Such levels of hypocrisy can never be an acceptable norm for Sanatanis with strong cultural roots.
Labels:

Comments

  1. DILIP KUMAR AGRAWAL MCom., LLB. , FCASeptember 6, 2020 at 10:12 PM

    It is just like बाल मे से खाल निकालना ! If you want to search a person who can be called दुध का धुला हुआ , you can never get. Hence simple thing is that you have to see anybody from comparative angle. Otherwise you can never find a PM or a big leader/politician without any doubtful behaviour or with 100% clean image . A person who is a successful politician will definitely Be having these qualities :
    1. A big lier
    1. Opportunistic
    3. Diplomatic behaviour
    Etc etc .

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dr Swamy's three step formula to make India a VishwaGuru again

BJP leader and eminent economist, Dr Subramanian Swamy, invited as a Chief Speaker at a recent webinar of TiE on "Making India Succeed", spoke at length on India's existing challenges and viable solutions to address these challenges. However, Dr Swamy categorically focused on three major areas, which will help to improve India's world status and restore the country's past glory.  These are explained below: Improve the state of Economy Abolish income tax to boost consumption and savings among households. Bring down interest rates on business loans up to the level of 6% p.a for MSMEs. Increase interest rate on FDs to 9% per annum to facilitate higher savings from households.  Build roads to connect all villages with nearby towns. This will improve connectivity, reduce unemployment, increase purchasing power and spur demand. Social Revolution Indians must start believing in themselves as belonging to the same ancestral tree and identify themselves as prod
7 comments
Read more

Pushpendra Kulshrestha - A Congi Mole within BJP?

Lets say that I am a nobody to comment on Pushpendra Kulshrestha (PK), in the same manner, PK has ZERO credibility (he is nobody) to comment on Dr Swamy. PK's track record suggests that he is fair weather friend of current government. PK could very well be a Congi mole disguised as a Hindutva speaker.  And I am truly flabbergasted to see the responses of Hindus. Apart from making videos and giving speeches on Public events, what is PK's contribution towards Hindutva?  Yes we do need warriors to speak in favor of Hindutva, however, it doesn't mean that we will accept anyone or everyone. Unfortunately, now days its like a popularity contest because anyone who speaks at a superficial level manages to get MAX eyeballs.  Due to emergence of these fake warriors, people have lost sight of the real on ground fighters. Just because a public speaker comes across as a Hindutva well-wisher, he may not necessarily be a genuine well-wisher.  However, these speakers, for their
3 comments
Read more

Withdraw minority specific reservations at Minority institutions, funded by tax payers money, to bring parity in education system

Minority institutions across India receive grants from government and channelize a large percentage of these funds for the welfare and benefits of minorities such as Christians, Muslims, Jains, Parasis etc. Such inconsistencies rip-off the right of hard-working and meritorious hindu students to receive benefits of better education from these institutes. Despite having a meritorious record, majority Hindu students are left out from these educational institutions only because of their religious background.  With 50% of the seats reserved for minorities, general category Hindu students have to fight for remaining seats. This is the prevalent trend among so called prestigious minority colleges such as St Stephens, St Xaviers, Jesus & Mary College, Loyola College etc. In a recent tweet, Dr Swamy highlighted St Stephens case to prove the disparities in the system. The tweet calls for a re-look at the existing education system with the purpose of introducing further reforms. 
5 comments
Read more